![]() ![]() “Everybody is just making this s- up as they go along! It’s completely arbitrary.” “It’s not as though 3% is some tried-and-true, empirically-derived heuristic that’s proven robust over many past pandemics,” he continued in a second posting. ”Ĭritics have questioned de Blasio and the city teachers union for their devotion to the metric - and Silver joined that chorus with a full-throated rebuke. ![]() “I don’t get why NYC feels bound to stick by a 3% positivity rule for closing schools when we know more about the virus now, including relatively low rates of transmission in schools,” he wrote. The data don said he was especially perplexed by Mayor Bill de Blasio’s reliance on a 3 percent infection rate trigger for shuttering the nation’s largest school system. Prominent statistician Nate Silver ripped City Hall’s closure of schools on Twitter Wednesday - and said parents should be “furious” with the controversial measure. Hello Doctor?! NYC plans $100M public health hotline Weingarten ruined kids' lives - but she refuses to apologize for not following the scienceĪ ray of hope from the subway on NYC's recovery COVID-19 pandemic is no longer a global emergency: WHO ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |